By CRRC-Armenia Junior Fellow Ani Karapetyan
In July, 2013, the end line survey within the Alternative Resources in Media (ARM) project reached its final stage. The baseline survey of the project was conducted in 2011, uncovering media preferences and concerns of the Armenian public. Detailed information on the 2011 survey is also available in the CRRC–Armenia blog post.
In July, 2013, the end line survey within the Alternative Resources in Media (ARM) project reached its final stage. The baseline survey of the project was conducted in 2011, uncovering media preferences and concerns of the Armenian public. Detailed information on the 2011 survey is also available in the CRRC–Armenia blog post.
In 2013, the end line
survey of the aforementioned project was also conducted; the results of which revealed much interesting information. Some ARM 2013 survey related materials have already been made available in CRRC–Armenia website. Meanwhile, you can
familiarize yourself with several of the survey findings presented below.
As one of the aims of
the ARM Project was to support alternative media content, it is interesting to
look into the traditional and alternative media use by the respondents of the
surveys.
Traditional media users’
numbers did not change considerably since 2011. The number of people watching
only TV increased by 6% and a 7% decrease occurred in the number of those who
both watch TV and listen to the radio. The picture with the Internet use is different: by the 2013 survey, the share of the Internet users increased by 20%. However, whilst changes in Internet use habits for those aged 16 – 25 and 26 to 60 are
not significant, people aged 26 – 30 started to use the Internet much more in
2013 compared to 2011. In 2011, 41% of respondents aged 26 to 30 used the
Internet in the last 12 months. By 2013, this percentage had increased to 81%. Further, while the Internet use increase in Yerevan (64
% in 2013 vs. 44% in 2011) was predictable, the increase of the level of Internet use in rural areas (by 24 percentage points) was surprising. It should
be also noted that the level of the Internet use in rural areas remains low
(61% of the respondents did not use the Internet in the last 12 months
according to the 2013 survey results) (see the Figure below).
In contrast to the 2011
survey, in 2013 respondents were asked about media owners. The results revealed
that media ownership is still unknown to general public: only 22
respondents (1.5% of all) were able to specify the names of the media owners,
and only 4% of the respondents (60 people) agreed that media owners influence
the media activity.
Analysis of Internet
privacy concerns revealed a decreasing trend: 27% of the respondents interviewed
in 2013 were not at all concerned with the Internet privacy issues compared to
19% in 2011. Thus, the Internet is perhaps considered as a trusted source of
alternative knowledge and information circulation.
This brief outline of
the 2011 and 2013 surveys is not wholly representative of what analyzing
power the survey has. It is a great source and tool for deeper analyses, and
all interested researchers, media representatives and policy makers are
invited to make use of the project database published.
Comments