By Mane Adamyan
CRRC-Armenia Junior Fellow
CRRC-Armenia Junior Fellow
Theoretically,
the aim of the education is not only to provide people with basic knowledge and
technical skills in a particular sphere but also to shape their worldview and critical
thinking. During their education, individuals are introduced to lifestyles and
new ideas, interact with their peers and get acquainted with nonconformity
which gradually becomes natural. Prior empirical work (Ohlanderet al., 2005; Lambertet al., 2006; Treas,2002, Loftus,2001) evidenced
a positive correlation between education and tolerance towards sexual minorities.
However, the case of Armenia is understudied in the literature.
Stemming
from the above-mentioned discussion, this blog post aims at revealing the
relationship between education and attitude towards homosexuality in the
Republic of Armenia.
The question below
measures the tolerance towards homosexuality:
“To what extent do you agree with the
following statements?” [1]
- Male homosexuality is a perversion.
- Female homosexuality is a perversion.
Since
the gender of the respondent may bias the perception of different types of
homosexuality (e.g., male respondent may be more tolerant towards female
homosexuals than male homosexuals), the above-mentioned question is split into
sub-questions to account for that phenomenon.
As
depicted in Chart 1, Armenian public has highly negative views towards gays and
lesbians. Only 6% of the respondents disagree that male homosexuality is a perversion.
Similarly, only 4% of the respondents believe that women should not be
“condemned” for their sexual orientation.
Chart 1
Regarding
the education profile of the respondents, out of 977 only 333 have higher
education, 597 completed secondary education, 40 have only primary education
and 7 respondents are students, applicants or pupils.
Chart 2
Chart
3 illustrates the results of the cross-tabulation analysis. It shows that 85%
of the highly educated individuals who participated in the survey express
negative attitude towards female homosexuality. In case of respondents with
secondary education this statistics primes to 96%. The attitude towards male homosexuality
is similar to that of female homosexuality. In particular, 81% of the
respondents with higher education express negative attitude towards male
homosexuals. For respondents with secondary education this result increases to
94%.
Chart 3
In
sum, we evidence almost no effect of education on positive attitude towards
sexual minorities in the Republic of Armenia. The explanation for this
phenomenon can be fewfold. First, Armenian society is highly religious. In
particular, more than 80% of the respondents accept to be religious according
to the Caucasus
Barometer (2015)[2].
Second, given the traditional nature of the Armenian society, family is
considered as a supreme value, which may undermine the effect of education on
respondents’ attitudes towards sexual minorities.
[1] “Social Attitudes towards LGBTI people in Armenia”, [2015]. “Public Information and Need of Knowledge” NGO in Armenia, in cooperation with Women’s Initiatives Supporting Group NGO from Georgia, within the frames of the project “Solidarity Network for LGBTI in Armenia and Georgia” financed by Heinrich Böll Foundation South Caucasus Regional Office, are carrying out a comprehensive study of social attitudes towards LGBTI people, including a survey carried out by CRRC-Armenia. The results of this research will be presented in July, 2016.
[2] Caucasus Barometer is a nationwide household survey with over 6,800 respondents
across the South Caucasus. It runs annually in Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia
based on the same methodological approach and the same survey instrument.
Comments